“Satan Isn’t Real”- A Response in Book Titles

I wrote a post about one of George Barna’s surveys  a while back. It has been a minute source of hits ever since. The above quote is my most common search term hit, and it bugs me a bit, so I take this opportunity to respond, on in book titles, rather than a blog title:

“Satan Is Alive and Well on Planet Earth”- Great title, not a favorite book.

“Sense and Nonsense About Angels and Demons” This book is NOT about that Dan Brown book, and all the better for it.

“The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist” is The Usual Suspects loosely quoting French poet Charles Baudelaire, who puts it in the mouth of a priest during a sermon in a story.

Normally, the work of the Devil is divided into two broad categories:

1. Ordinary activity: Temptation, seduction to evil

2. Extraordinary activity: possession, obsession, para-natural things they make movies, TV shows and books about.

It’s always a question for many: why does the Devil ever stick his head up long enough to do these extraordinary things? Don’t they prove his existence, thus hindering his most effective undercover guerilla warfare for souls?

I am not alone in suggesting two answers:

1. Direct encounters with para natural evil are not necessarily the Devil’s idea. Many a pastor of many a religious tradition suggests that the Devil only shows himself openly when forced to by God, who plainly means to improve the faith of those involved and bring people outside the church within her walls.

2. So many people are so turned off by the reports of the goings on in these encounters (both Evil and Good’s methods) that they are an effective tool of the Devil in keeping people away from God, at least looking at things from a distance.

And that’s more than I typically like to say about spiritual warfare, a subject that I feel gets entirely more interest than it deserves. Or, as everyone quotes from C.S. Lewis:

“There are two equal and opposite errors into which our race can fall about the devils. One is to disbelieve in their existence. The other is to believe,and to feel an excessive and unhealthy interest in them. They themselves are equally pleased by both errors, and hail a materialist or magician with the same delight.” The Screwtape Letters, pg. ix

Advertisements

2 responses to ““Satan Isn’t Real”- A Response in Book Titles

  1. Could be part of the Alien subduction.
    Who else would put suction tubes on your penis.
    I don’t know although if strangers with huge black eye lenses had a suction cup on my dick I think that I would think that it was demonic.

    • Christians and skeptics alike have noted the similarity in Medieval demon and fairy encounters with modern alien abduction stories.

      The utter lack of scientific physical evidence of extr-terrestrial landings– ranging from poor remains at “landing” sites to the utter lack of reports of sightings by the reams of amateur and professional astronomers staring skyward every night– has lead both UFO believers and some Christians (many of whom do indeed take a demonological view of alien abduction) to the inter-dimensional explanation of UFOs and alien encounters. As a religious explanation it’s not necessarily so bad, since spiritual doesn’t necessarily equate with physical. For any sort of science it suffers plausibility problems. As in, it’s pretty much sci-fi right now how one would accomplish inter-dimensional travel, especially without leaving all sorts of obviously detectable signs for science to find.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s